Skip to content
Cambridgeshire Counts — Cambridgeshire, in numbers.Local help →

East Cambridgeshire, in numbers

Issues and SWOT: East Cambridgeshire

East Cambridgeshire local authority area. Every figure carries its own date.

Strengths to build on. Pressures to address. Choices to make.

These assessments connect evidence with proposed responses. They are not ratings of council performance.

Strengths

strength

Use the museum’s longer lease to plan for the future

Ely Museum has an extended lease to support future investment.

A clearer tenure position can help the museum seek funding.

Evidence

What could help →

strength

Make room for homes people can afford

Average private rent is £1,038 a month (August 2026) in East Cambridgeshire council area. This is £421 lower than the England average for the same month. Homes rented privately ranged from 10% in Sutton to 25.3% in Ely East — a gap of 15.3 percentage points.

Housing costs matter most alongside earnings and the number of affordable homes available. A local average cannot tell us whether a particular household can afford its home.

What could help →

strength

Bring support closer to people in poor health

4.1% of people reported bad or very bad health in East Cambridgeshire council area (21 March 2021). Across England, the figure was 5.2%. People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 2.7% in Ely North to 5% in Littleport — a gap of 2.4 percentage points.

This is how residents described their health in the census. It can reveal differences between neighbourhoods, but does not diagnose illness or measure current waiting times. Age profiles differ between places, so these shares do not measure service quality.

What could help →

strength

Connect local skills to local opportunities

35% of people aged 16 or over had a degree or equivalent (21 March 2021) in East Cambridgeshire council area. Across England, the figure was 33.9%. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 11.2% in Ely North to 21% in Soham South — a gap of 9.8 percentage points.

Qualifications show one part of the skills available locally. They do not show whether people have secure jobs or work that uses those skills.

What could help →

Weaknesses

weakness

Close the gap between a funded route and a usable journey

The Ely–Soham route has a construction target of March 2030.

Residents still need workable journeys while delivery is pending.

Evidence

What could help →

Opportunities

opportunity

Follow Arbour Square’s grant through to social rented homes

The council has approved funding to convert planned sale homes at Arbour Square to social rent.

Proposed response: Track the agreed change through to completed homes being available in the intended tenure.

Evidence

What could help →

opportunity

Make Ely’s new routes work as complete journeys

Ely–Soham has entered a funded programme, while New Barns Avenue has a separately listed footpath scheme. Neither announcement proves an open, continuous journey.

Proposed response: show each route’s remaining gaps, safe crossings and connections to everyday destinations.

Evidence 1 · Evidence 2

What could help →

opportunity

Plan homes and care around an older population

20.8% of people in East Cambridgeshire council area were aged 65 or over (21 March 2021). People aged 65 or over ranged from 13% in Ely North to 25.8% in Bottisham — a gap of 12.8 percentage points.

Age alone does not mean poor health or a need for care. Accessible homes, reliable transport and support close to home matter as people get older.

What could help →

opportunity

Target safety work where problems repeat

Mapped police records are available for neighbourhoods in East Cambridgeshire council area.

Published locations are approximate and some crimes are not mapped. Counts show recorded incidents, not the chance of an individual becoming a victim.

What could help →

opportunity

Turn published plans into visible progress

4 named local projects or plans have official evidence in this collection.

A published plan makes responsibilities and intentions easier to inspect. It does not prove that funding is secured or that promised benefits have arrived.

What could help →

opportunity

Target support where disadvantages overlap

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 9.4% in Ely North to 17.5% in Littleport — a gap of 8.1 percentage points.

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

What could help →

Threats

threat

Keep affordable-housing funding tied to homes people can occupy

The Arbour Square grant changes the intended tenure of planned homes.

A funding decision is not proof that homes have been let.

Evidence

What could help →